Roger Caiazza analyzes the supposed health benefits of fighting climate change and finds the benefits are hugely overstated and assume things that make no sense in the real world.
Thanks for your detailed analysis. This could be a model for analyzing other terrible policies, where the costs are underestimated and the benefits overestimated (in some cases wildly overestimated).
Thanks for your detailed analysis. This could be a model for analyzing other terrible policies, where the costs are underestimated and the benefits overestimated (in some cases wildly overestimated).
You may not be aware the PM2.5 claims are almost certainly untrue https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0273230017301538
I was aware! Thanks!
My sense, though, is that we're making progress and some on the other side agree.