3 Comments
User's avatar
Al Christie's avatar

It makes perfect sense that more sunshine causes more warming.

However, I don't know how we can extrapolate from Krakow to global. Maybe when there's less stratus clouds in Poland, there's more somewhere else.

William Rickards's avatar

But Global Boiling is caused by CO2? Never the 4.6 billion years of changing climate, continental drift over a molten core, asteroid collisions, volcanic activity and 400,000, 100,000, 20,000 year cycles in the earths orbit and orientation to the sun. Nor the fact that our solar system is travelling at over 500,000 mph through space and takes about 230 million years to rotate around our galaxy. Thus our earth has travelled 20 times around the milky way - exposing itself to vastly different gravitational pulls from the sun and far distant other suns and closer large planets, which slightly alter the earths axis tilt and eccentricity, and thus the sunlight it recieves. But it's the CO2, the gas of life, that causes all the weather we see (right now?).

Jeff Chestnut's avatar

Guterres proved he is an abject idiot with that statement. A change in temperature over a short time period is weather not climate. A change in one location is weather. At the same time there is a high temperature in one place the opposite hemisphere has a low temperature. The entire concept of global warming and climate change is so blown out of context and proportion it has created a media frenzy. The climate of earth has changed constantly over time - real time in context of the earth’s history. CO2 cannot cause the warming the climatocatastrophists claim we are experiencing. The thermodynamics, chemistry, and physics do not support the claims. But look at the sun and you have a great clue as to the heat delivered to the earth. We need more CO2, my food wants more to eat and the plants will grow more with an increase of CO2.