Guest post by Jim Willis of Marcellus Drilling News.
For months, MDN has told you about a problem brewing that will block new hydrogen projects from getting built in the Marcellus/Utica (M-U). It’s an obscure tax rule known as the 45V tax credit, part of the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The Bidenistas at the White House, Treasury Department, and Dept. of Energy proposed a new IRS rule in late December that the 45V tax credits (as provided for in the IRA) can only be used if the hydrogen produced is “green” — meaning NOT made from natural gas.
In addition, the electricity used to produce the hydrogen can’t come from fossil fuel sources like natural gas (if you want the tax credit). Biden kneecapped the hydrogen hub projects in the M-U (see Biden’s Proposed IRA 45V Tax Credit “Kneecaps” ARCH2 Hydrogen Hub).
Assuming the Bidenistas refuse to change the rule (so far they have refused), only the “greenest” (i.e., most expensive) hydrogen projects, those that use electricity from solar and wind and that don’t use natural gas as a feedstock, will get a $3 per kilogram of hydrogen produced tax credit.
This means that companies that don’t qualify to receive the maximum 45V credit can still invest, but their investment is now at a much higher risk and far less profitable than it would have been had the 45V rule applied. There may be some investment in M-U hydrogen hub projects (namely the ARCH2 project), but even if some projects get built, ARCH2 under the existing 45V tax credit will be an empty shell of what it could have been.
Luke Bernstein, president and CEO of the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business & Industry, writes in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review that the current Biden 45V tax credit “puts PA’s hydrogen future at risk.” Berstein outlines that if 45V is not changed, it is lights out for hydrogen in PA. Actually, all of the M-U (emphasis added).
For the past two decades, Pennsylvania has been at the forefront of the shale revolution, which has delivered incredible quantities of affordable natural gas and fundamentally reshaped national and global energy markets.
What’s incredible is not just the sheer scale of production — the gas produced in Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale also has the lowest emissions of any basin in the United States, according to environmental group data. As a result, many of the companies here are certified producers of differentiated natural gas (DNG), which validates the ultra-low-methane attributes of natural gas produced here.
Now, a bipartisan coalition of federal and state policymakers, businesses, and labor unions are hoping to leverage our low-methane, abundant natural gas reserves to help spur the development of clean hydrogen.
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) of 2021 established the Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs (H2Hubs) Program, which would form the foundation of a national clean hydrogen network that could decarbonize some of our state’s highest emitting sectors of the economy, like steel and cement production, and heavy-duty transportation.
In the three years since the BIL’s enactment, the Department of Energy (DOE) selected seven H2Hub applications, including two proposals — the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub (ARCH2) and the Mid-Atlantic Clean Hydrogen Hub (MACH2) — that will benefit Pennsylvania. The state’s western hub in particular will demonstrate the benefits of using Pennsylvania’s low-methane natural gas to produce clean hydrogen.
Despite this progress, the H2Hubs program did not address the fundamental barrier to clean hydrogen use: cost. Before industries even consider switching to clean hydrogen, it has to achieve cost parity with existing fuel sources.
Congress sought to overcome hydrogen’s cost barrier through the Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit (45V), which was passed under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022. The 45V tax credit was structured as a tiered incentive based on the carbon intensity of produced clean hydrogen – the lower the carbon emissions, the higher the credit a producer can receive, up to $3 per kilogram.
But D.C. regulators, including the Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service (IRS), have issued proposed guidance that would make it harder for clean hydrogen producers using Marcellus Shale gas to qualify for the 45V tax credit, putting at risk the economic and environmental benefits Pennsylvania should see from hydrogen development.
At issue for Pennsylvania is the 45V regulation’s mandate to use a national average for upstream methane emissions within the carbon intensity calculation. The IRS does not allow producers to use project-specific data to be used in place of the national average, even if the hydrogen producer is using certified DNG. This is a major problem; it defies the intent of Congress and will negatively impact Pennsylvania’s ability to deliver a viable clean hydrogen market.
First, enforcing a national average upstream emission rate will lead to inaccurate carbon intensity calculations and potentially alter the level of tax credit a producer earns, which impacts project financing and profitability.
Second, the national average rate creates a market environment where producers like those in Pennsylvania who achieve a lower emissions rate receive no benefit for certified operational excellence, while producers that exceed the national average rate can claim a carbon intensity score they did not earn. The result is one in which other regions producing hydrogen from natural gas receive a benefit they didn’t earn, while Pennsylvania producers are punished for doing the right thing.
In response to this imminent federal policy blunder, Pennsylvania government officials, including Democratic officials like Gov. Josh Shapiro, Sens. Bob Casey and John Fetterman, and Rep. Chris Deluzio, D-Aspinwall, are finding common ground with Republicans, business and labor unions on the 45V issue. In a politically charged environment where it can be difficult to get Democrats and Republicans to agree on the day of the week, this short-sighted proposed guidance has actually brought all sides together.
Specifically, this common cause also includes pushing for final guidance that recognizes coal mine methane as a valid feedstock under the 45V Hydrogen Production Tax Credit, which is essential for the financial viability of projects like CNX Resources’ proposed $1.5 billion hydrogen plant at Pittsburgh International Airport. This project alone could create 3,000 construction jobs and significantly reduce emissions, showcasing Pennsylvania’s robust and diverse energy sector.
For Pennsylvania’s hydrogen hubs to succeed and become a pillar for our region’s economic and energy future, D.C. regulators will need to change course and get the final guidance right by removing the mandate to use a national average for upstream methane emissions and recognizing coal mine methane as a viable feedstock in the clean energy economy.
#Casey #Pennsylvania #Fetterman #Hydrogen #MarcellusShale #NaturalGas
For more great articles on natural gas development every single day, subscribe to Marcellus Drilling News using this convenient link.
For once, I agree with Biden’s puppeteers. Hydrogen makes no sense at all, with or without subsidies. Restricting subsidies to Green Hydrogen makes perfect sense to me. It makes hydrogen even more expensive and therefore much less likely to do permanent damage. If you have natural gas, burn the natural gas. Don’t pretend it is better to make hydrogen out of it. It isn’t better. It is stupid. Chasing subsidies is wrong, whether done by big wind or shale drillers.
I'm still learning. I thought natural gas is methane; CH4. What is "low methane" natural gas?